Archive

Archive for the ‘zionism’ Category

Former chief rabbi of Israel says all non-Jews are donkeys, created to serve Jews

October 19, 2010 Leave a comment

“Non-Jews were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world-only to serve the People of Israel.”

Major rabbi says all we non-Jews are donkeys, created to serve Jews

From Khalid Amayreh in occupied East Jerusalem

A major Jewish religious figure in Israel has likened non-Jews to donkeys and beasts of burden, saying the main reason for their very existence is to serve Jews.

Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, spiritual mentor of the religious fundamentalist party, Shas, which represents Middle Eastern Jews, reportedly said during a Sabbath homily earlier this week that “the sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews.”

Yosef is considered a major religious leader in Israel who enjoys the allegiance of hundreds of thousands of followers.

Shas is a chief coalition partner in the current Israeli government,

Yosef, also a former Chief Rabbi of Israel, was quoted by the right-wing newspaper, the Jerusalem Post, as saying that the basic function of a goy, a derogatory word for a gentile, was to serve Jews.

“Non-Jews were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world-only to serve the People of Israel,” Yosef said in his weekly Saturday night sermon which was devoted to laws regarding actions non-Jews are permitted to perform on the Sabbath.

Yosef also reportedly said that the lives of non-Jews in Israel are preserved by God in order to prevent losses to Jews.

Yosef, widely considered a prominent Torah sage and authority on the interpretation of Talmud, a basic Jewish scripture, held a comparison between animals of burden and non-Jews.

“In Israel, death has no dominion over them…With gentiles, it will be like any person-They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.

“This is his servant…That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.”

Read more

Advertisements
Categories: Israel, Jews, zionism

Jews not Prosecuted for Violating Canada’s Hate Laws

June 13, 2010 Leave a comment

Jews not Prosecuted for Violating Canada’s Hate Laws

by Ian Mosley

Posted By deduke On 13th June 2010

Canada’s so-called “hate laws” have for long been among the most draconian and tyrannical in the world, including the establishment of extra-legal kangaroo courts called “Human Rights Tribunals” that have all the powers of a court. The purpose of these infamous tribunals is to silence all criticism of the Canadian government’s racial and immigration polices, but more particularly to silence any criticism of Israel or the Jews. Not too surprisingly, one of these tribunals has decided that Jewish hatred of non-Jews should get the blind eye.

According to the [1] Canadian National Post: “The Canadian Jewish Congress says the Toronto Police Service is pushing anti-hate law ‘to its most absurd level’ by listing ‘non-Jewish Shiksa’ as a victim category in its latest hate crime study. The statistical report reveals that officers investigated hate crimes in Toronto last year against such unusual victim groups as teachers, feminists, infidels, police, Nazis and pedophiles. But it is the redundantly named category of ‘non-Jewish Shiksa’ — a slur for a non-Jewish woman, from a Hebrew root meaning ‘a detested thing’ — that has especially baffled the CJC, a prominent advocate for stronger hate crime laws. ‘You just can’t apply it to literally everything,’ said CEO Bernie Farber.” (Read: You can’t apply it to Jews.)

The [2] National Post goes on. “The 2009 shiksa incident, classified as mischief, happened in 53 Division, a central uptown area colloquially known among police as ‘Sleepy Hollow’ because it includes the city’s most pleasant residential communities, including some of the Jewish neighbourhoods around Bathurst and Lawrence. It is not known whether a charge was laid, or a prosecution successful.” (I would love to know the details of that “incident.”)

Nowhere else is the liberal hypocrisy of so-called “hatecrime” laws more blatantly on display than in cases where the Jews are involved.

For starters. the entire Jewish religion is, of course, based on a concept of racial supremacy. The Jews seriously believe they are better than the rest of humanity. Yet I very much doubt that any rabbis will be summoned before any Canadian Human Rights Tribunals any time soon for possession of the Babylonian Talmud. (Although a few years ago some legislators in Russia did attempt to outlaw the Talmud as “hate literature”.)

Read more here:

Jews not prosecuted for violating Canada’s hate laws

Categories: Israel, Jews, zionism

The Passover Media Attacks on the Catholic Church

April 3, 2010 Leave a comment

Let me start out by telling you that I am neither a Christian nor a Catholic, yet I cannot help notice that at the beginning of what Christians call ‘Holy Week’ the Jew-controlled press once again started recycling their Catholic pedophile stories under the guise of ‘news’. No other group it seems, other than White Nationalists, can be so freely smeared with mere allegations than the Catholic Church, or Christian clergy in general, which would include Protestants.

Don’t get me wrong: I am not defending those who truly are guilty of this crime. I believe all pedophiles – religious and non-religious alike – should be punished severely if they are in fact guilty (something that doesn’t happen often, ironically because the Jewish influence in the justice system has made it soft on criminals).

But one thing that sticks out like a big hooked-nose to me about these Jewish media attacks is their viciousness. The onslaught has been rabid, incessant, and continues uninterrupted even as I type this. And it is not applied exclusively to those priests who are accused (and they are only accused at this point), but is deliberately applied to the Catholic clergy as a whole.

Instead of pointing out the fact that there are literally hundreds of clergy in the Church and a small minority are pedophiles, the Jewish press implies the opposite, and all the while ignoring the many pedophile rabbis who disproportionately far outnumber the Catholic clergy involved in abuse and are usually far more abusive. See the video below of the ‘Hummer Rabbi’ who tortured children with hammers and saws and forced them to drink turpentine – completely ignored by the Jewish press.

But back to my point, it’s the incessant nature of the attacks by the Jewish press on the Church which sticks out to me the most. Why are they so vicious?

Well, it is Holy Week for Christians, so this provides the media with a perfect opportunity to smear them. But it is also Passover for the Jews.

Those of you who have studied Jewish history know full well that many Jewish holidays commemorate massacres against non-Jewish peoples. Purim for instance, is the celebration of the Jewish massacre of 75,000 Persians who were aware of how the Jews had infiltrated the Persian monarchy and were prepared to take action against them. Then there is the celebration of Hanukkah which disguises itself as a ‘festival of lights’ but in reality serves to remind the Jews of their slaughter of the Syrian Greeks, whose crime according to the rabbis was merely allowing the Jews to assimilate. See the video at the bottom, Hanukkah Hypocrisy.

And then there is Passover. This is a holiday in which many non-Jews, even those who have critically studied Jewish customs, do not fully understand its true meanings. Passover begins on the night of the first full moon after the Vernal Equinox, so the seasonal timing of Passover has become nature-based just the holidays of other religions are – Easter, Ostara, etc.

Passover is a reminder to modern Jews of the final plague that their “God” inflicted on the people of Egypt, in which all the first born male children of the Egyptians were killed by the “Angel of Death” and the Jews were spared only by smearing the blood of a sacrificed lamb on their doors. Many superstitious people, including many Christians, take this as a literal supernatural ‘act of God’ without deciphering the Hebrew metaphors which tell the true story of the bloody holiday of Passover.

Anyone who studies Jewish history and their behavioral characteristics will realize after a while that “God” is simply a pseudonym for the Jewish nation. This is no doubt why the Jews are “God’s chosen people” and that “God’s will” is always carried out in the Bible through the Jews.

It is only after understanding this precept that we can fully understand what actually took place during Passover in the age of Egypt and what is being done to the Catholic Church, and the White race as a whole, as I type this.

So after understanding that “God” is simply the Jews we can then correctly point out that when “God” inflicted the final plague on the Egyptian children, it was simply the Jews themselves who did this. And the so-called “Angel of Death” was most likely a rabbi or Hebrew elder(s) who poisoned the food and/or water of all the houses which did not have the blood of a sacrificed animal on the doors.

The lamb’s blood on the doors is what signaled the Hebrew elders to pass over (Passover) because this was a Hebrew house. The lamb represents innocence, because the Jews are always innocent and the Gentiles are always guilty, according to Jewish law.

There are two attributes of this story, whether it is factual or legend, which cannot be ignored.

1. By admission in their own holy book, the Jews do engage in ritual animal sacrifice, hence sacrifice of the lamb and the smearing of blood on the doors, and that the charges leveled against them during the Middle Ages and every subsequent time are probably true. Of course, one would only need to observe the modern ritual of Kapparot during Yom Kippur to confirm this.

2. Jews most likely do engage in the poisoning of food and water, as this was most likely the way they killed the Egyptian first-borns. These were also identical charges that were brought against them during the Middle Ages leading the Jews to create the term “blood libel,” a reactionary position insinuating that the charges of poisoning against the Jews are libelous. See Jewish Ritual Murder at the bottom of the page.

Back to modern times….

As the onslaught of Jewish media attacks against the Catholic Church continues during the time of Passover, one cannot escape the conclusion that the Jews commemorate their holidays not only in remembrance of Jewish history, but also as a time to viciously attack one of their current enemies.

In ancient times it was the Egyptians. In modern times it is Christendom and all European culture and peoples. Instead of poisoning the waters (although I’m sure this does take place to a lesser extent in modern times), the Jews use their control of the mass media and their control of the ‘educational system’ to poison the minds of Gentile youth, leading them against their own elders who would protect them and give them a safe and productive society, and delivering them straight into a third-world hell-on-earth. And that is exactly where western civilization is headed.

Happy Passover!

Categories: Israel, zionism

Should White people re-segregate for protection?

September 2, 2009 Leave a comment

Israeli Jews have segregation laws to separate their society from Arabs as to protect their people from “terrorism.” But Jews are at the forefront of forcing White Americans to integrate with nonwhites – even though nonwhites have killed far more Whites in America than Arabs have killed Jews in Palestine.

Racially-segregated schools, neighborhoods, bars, nightclubs, even libraries and restrooms. The prohibition of interracial marriages, racial attacks, riots and political oppression. No, I’m not talking about America of 1950. I’m talking about Israel of 2009.

In May, Israel banned Palestinians from holding their “Arab Culture Day” in Jerusalem. Many Israeli schools also have bans on Black Jews, or Beta Israel as they are known. Recently, three Israeli schools refused to admit 100 Ethiopian Jews and they have often been oppressed by Israel’s racial laws.

Israel is not a multicultural society where all racial groups are represented equally. Although Jews have pushed this societal model on Whites in the West, they definitely fall far short of the same thing in their own country. In fact, Israel goes a long way in repressing any form of non-Jewish culture inside their own state, as is we can see.

By now most around the world are familiar with Israel’s Wall of Separation, which the Jews refer to as the “West Bank Barrier.” We have all seen pictures and footage of Israeli military checkpoints in and around Jerusalem, with soldiers pointing their guns at unarmed civilians.

While Israel argues that segregation laws and the Wall of Separation exist to protect the Jewish population from suicide bombers, it also cuts off many Palestinians from water and medicinal services and deprives them of access to the land that their ancestors have been on for thousands of years before the arrival of the modern Jews.

It is certainly true that the Wall of Separation has probably helped reduce the number of suicide attacks against Israeli nightclubs and city buses, in which anywhere from zero to twenty Jews would die in each attack.

But is the threat of Palestinians killing Jews really a legitimate reason to create an entire Berlin-style wall, complete with armed guards and Soviet-style checkpoints?

Well if it is, then White Americans should have HUNDREDS of these walls all over America to restrict the movement of blacks and mestizos!

The number of Whites killed by nonwhites in America every year is astronomically higher than the number of Jews killed by Palestinians throughout the entire intifada. In 2007 alone there were more than 12,000 black on white murders in the USA. But from 2005 to 2008 there were less than 1200 Jews killed by Palestinians, and this figure includes military casualties. And from 1987 to 2000 there were less than 500 Jews killed by Palestinians.

More White Americans died in six months at the hands of blacks in 2007 than Jews died at the hands of Palestinians from 1987 to 2000.

So if an entire 1200 Jews is worth a large concrete barricade with machine guns, then certainly White Americans could justify re-segregating themselves from nonwhites for protection. And when presented with these facts, most people would probably agree…..

….except for one group.

Jewish ethnocentric hypocrisy

Of course, it is not the fact that Jews are ethnocentric and only see the world through their eyes that bothers people. Certainly any logical person would expect Jews to look out for Jewish interests. But why then are Jews always at the forefront of keeping other races from looking out for their own interests as well? Do other races have the right to live in safety? or just Jews?

When made aware of this double standard, it is easy to see that it is not purely Jewish nationalism that angers people – it is the hypocrisy factor. Jews are permitted to use extreme measures to protect their people, i.e. the Wall of Separation, meanwhile they shriek and spit at what mostly are minor efforts on the part of other races to protect their people, i.e. enforcing existing border laws between the US and Mexico. The opposition to border enforcement in the US Congress and Senate comes mainly from Jews such as Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein, who are huge supporters of Israel and its own apartheid laws. Other Jewish groups such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith also oppose any US effort to secure the border with Mexico.

While Whites forbade Blacks from living in their neighborhoods at one time, they certainly had no walls with machine-gunners like the Jews have for themselves in the West Bank.

Throughout the “Civil Rights Era” when Blacks were demanding new rights and special privileges in America (not to mention burning our cities down), and also demanding that the segregation laws which kept Whites and Blacks in separate neighborhoods, schools, etc, be torn down, they were being helped along the way by Jewish finance and political power.

Like Communism before, most Black power movements in America were not the ideas of Blacks but were mostly the brainchilds of Jews from New York and California. As Dr. Kevin MacDonald documents in his book The Culture of Critique, Jewish influence was heavy in tearing down America’s segregation laws and ushering in the new era of political correctness, race-mixing, and with it rampant Black-on-White murder.

Jews were also heavily involved in passing the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. This law removed all of the previous standards for immigration and was particularly favorable to non-European immigrants. As noted on the Wikipedia page, this act flooded the US with non-European immigrants and was the final push which changed the ethnic balance of America and has doomed it to eventually become a third world nation as it will sometime in the early 21st century.

This act was proposed by Emanuel Celler….a Jew.


Even to this day, many White Americans are unaware that Black power was a Jewish idea.

The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee were also behind the push to open America’s borders.

These facts are not even mentioned to any significant extent in the mass media, which is almost completely controlled by Jews.

And while all these things were happening here in America, Jews were busy in Israel using American tax dollars and military tech to remove the Arabs from Palestine and set up their racially segregated apartheid state, which White Americans still fund.

So why the hypocrisy? Why not the same rules and protections for Whites to keep us safe from Blacks as Israel has to keep their people safe from suicide bombers? Especially when one considers that far more White people are dying from racial integration than Jews are dying after 50 years of war with the Arabs.

Well if you ask them that question, the Jews don’t really have a legitimate answer….

….except that you are now a Nazi who is secretly conspiring to kill six million of them.

Canadian Patriot Jailed for Speaking Out Against Israel

August 27, 2009 Leave a comment

Preface: On the ‘Rule of Law’

The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) has maintained a campaign of suppression against its political opponents under the guise of promoting ‘human rights’. In my case they have pursued me from place to place, arranged for me to get fired from various jobs between 2005 and now, smeared my name in the media, had my bank accounts canceled, and even threatened employers with adverse media publicity unless they fired me. Such is the status of ‘human rights’ and the ‘rule of law’ under this current regime. If we had a genuine rule of law in Canada there would be a treason investigation concerning how entire agencies of the Canadian government have been co-opted in the interests of a foreign power, The Zionist Entity in Palestine (Israel).

The CHRC Complaint

The CHRC began attacking me in April 2005. I received a registered letter on April 8, 2005 advising me that a ‘human rights’ complaint had been filed against me. What was my great offense? I had stated that communism was Jewish and that communism was essentially a plague. It had resulted in the death of millions of the best and brightest in the former Russian empire at the hands of the CHEKA, most of whom were Jews (a fact that was well known throughout the world at that time but conveniently forgotten since). It did not matter whether the content of my remarks were true. All that mattered was whether my writings had exposed certain privileged minorities to ‘hatred and/or contempt’.

I was shocked upon receiving the complaint. I had thought that all my remarks were fair social commentary. I admit that I used strong language but in light of the historical events I was discussing it was my belief that my remarks were in bounds. Not according to the CHRC, however! The CHRC, with Richard Warman as its front man, set about to destroy me. They attempted to make sure I could not find employment and that, if found, I would soon be fired. This has happened several times both before and after the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) hearing and their judgment against me. The fact that they began their campaign of destruction even prior to the hearing demonstrated to me that I had already been found guilty and that the upcoming hearing (in the grand tradition of the Soviet show trial) would just be a formality for appearances sake. At the hearing itself the CHRC even tried to deprive me of representation.

The CHRT found me guilty, of course. No one has ever been found innocent at any of their show trials. I was levied a $4000 fine even though the tribunal knew I had no way to pay it and the CHRC together with Richard Warman had done everything in their power to ensure that I would become destitute. Such is the notion of fairness in the thinking of the ‘human rights’ commissars. The one goal of the human rights bureaucracy is to crush and grind under its heel all its political opponents. In my view, it has nothing to with securing human rights and everything to do with promoting a Zionist political agenda. Their activities represent the politicizing of the judicial process. This trend will continue until it is stopped.

The Judicial Appeal in Federal Court

I appealed the ruling of the CHRT in Federal Court. That process turned out to be a farce. The judge ruled against me and her written judgment seemed to rely on the most superficial reasoning and shallow understanding of the issues at stake. I was truly surprised! However, my surprise ended when I found out she was a star contributor to the Canadian Jewish Congress. In other words, she was an activist Jew. The fair hearing I thought I would receive in Federal Court had turned out to be an extension of the CHRT judicial farce.

In Canada and elsewhere the phrase ‘human rights’ is taking on the unbearable stench of tyranny. This regime is attempting to replace our God-given and inalienable rights of free speech, free assembly, and self-defense with United Nations -style ‘human rights’ which can be granted with one hand and taken away with the other.

The CHRC as an Agent of a Foreign Power

Following the Federal Court ruling I did further research on the activities of the CHRC and discovered that that agency, supposedly an agency of OUR Canadian government, is actually acting as an agent or proxy of the B’nai Brith, a Jewish Masonic organization active in suppressing anti-Zionist political activity in Canada, the US, and elsewhere. In view of that fact it is no longer a surprise that many, perhaps most, of the CHRC’s targets are people on both the right and left who are critical of the Zionist political agenda.

Resistance to that agenda has been in the form of words, mostly on the Internet, and some low level political activity such as leafleting and small demonstrations. I had always been taught that is the way one is supposed to do it in a civilized society – i.e. peacefully through words and persuasion. Strategic resistance was to be for countries where peaceful resistance was not allowed. Unfortunately, here in Canada we are moving towards the point where strategic resistance to the Zionist agenda will be the only option available.

When the CHRC began attacking me I went into a downward spiral eventually reaching the point where I became suicidal and had to seek treatment for severe depression. At some point I decided to start fighting back and have been doing so ever since. I emphasize that at present the tools of our struggle are words and persuasion. That is the correct way in a country that still enjoys some of the trappings of the civilization that our European ancestors brought here. If the CHRC and the co-opted courts are able to silence peaceful dissent they will eventually have to deal with strategic political struggle and that is something I hope this country never has to face.

Opposition to White Decline

Available statistics strongly suggest that the White race, defined as the race of people traditionally associated with Europe and the British Isles, is on a trajectory toward minority status by the middle of this century and virtual extinction by the end of the century. Countries with high birth rates are using formerly White countries as a dumping ground for their excess populations. I call this demographic genocide. That this is a deliberate policy being carried out by the social engineers with a globalist agenda is clear. Bill Clinton, in a speech given not long after leaving office, stated that he looked forward to a time when Whites are a minority in the US.

Population experts have stated that the trend towards extinction will be irreversible long before the end of this century. That is why I consider the battle to preserve our people from such a fate to be of such urgency that all available efforts must be applied now. It is an imperative of Nature that each species secure its own existence and protect its own living space. As a former Mathematics lecturer I gave examples from population biology in the course I taught in Differential Equations. It can be shown within that subject that no two species can occupy the same environmental niche over the long term. Applied to a multi-racial society the implications are clear. Either the various races within a multi-racial context will merge to form a single uniformly brown mass of hybrids or they will fight each for its own bit of turf in a racial turf war. The first outcome implies the extinction of the White race and the second implies civil war and chaos.

All White Nationalists support what is commonly called the 14 words: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children”. That I support the 14 words, as do all White Nationalists, was used against me at the CHRT hearing. Ms Warsame, a Black female from Africa, quoted the 14 words with obvious disdain in her voice which rose to a higher level of disdain and contempt as she quoted “a future for White children” as though such a notion that White children should have a future in this world is an idea worthy of the disdain and contempt in her voice.

Future Developments

A question I would like to address to the CHRC is “What do they hope to achieve?” Do they think that once they have suppressed all political dissent in Canada that they will have established a multi-racial utopia? Granted, there may be a period of silence for a while. That will be but the silence before the storm breaks. Our people will not go silently into the dark night of racial extinction. Our people will not simply submerge themselves willingly into the brown swamp of third-world biomass. There will be resistance and that resistance, unfortunately, will be, by necessity, strategic!

Charter Rights

My opponent (Daniel Poulin, a lawyer for the CHRC) has advised me in a telephone conversation that my Internet writings go beyond what the Charter of Rights allows. His comments reminded me of something penned by Thomas Paine, the man who literally wrote the book on the Rights of Man, who said that charters of rights are written not to give rights but to take them away. According to Paine, the true rights of man are inherent in him as a creature of God and are thus inalienable. No government can give or take away inalienable rights. The writers of the US Declaration of Independence were careful to state they were not intending to create rights which had not previously existed but were seeking to acknowledge rights that inhere in man as a creature of God.

Canada: The Orwellian Animal Farm

We are currently living and dying under the regime of political correctness – the new one-world civic religion of Equality. This new religion even has, in the alleged ‘Holocaust’, its own sacrificial lamb. The idea of equality within this new religion is a paradoxical thing. As George Orwell pointed out in his book Animal Farm, some groups are more equal than others – Jews and other minorities but mostly Jews. It has its own enforcers of correct dogma and those who violate the rules are treated as blasphemers and hauled before their special courts. The new sins within the one-world religion of Equality are racism, anti-Semitism, so-called homophobia (revulsion against the practice of homosexuality), and so-called sexism (failure to genuflect before the goddess of feminism). However, the greatest sin in the new one-world religion of Equality is to promote the interests of White people and seek to preserve OUR existence.

The Notion of Human Equality

In my judicial appeal of the CHRT ruling I stressed that the idea of human equality rests on nothing. Before we can determine whether a statement is true or false we need to know what it means. It turns out that the statement that all human beings are equal is either a tautology (true by definition) as in ‘all triangles are equally triangular’ or is false as in ‘all triangles are equal as triangles’. In order to state whether two human beings are equal as human beings we need a means of determination such as we have for triangles (congruency). For human beings such a means does not exist. In Nature no two things above the molecular level are equal. No two snowflakes are equal and that applies to human beings as well.

The US Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson, states that it is self-evident that all men are created equal. However,

[Jefferson] was not a moron, and cannot have meant anything so absurd as is sometimes supposed. What he meant was that all Englishmen should be equal before the law. He was reacting against the class structure of English society and an aristocracy, of which the greater part had been created by kings and ennobled parvenus, often for the most discreditable services,
so that socially and morally worthless individuals were given special privileges because they were descended from men who had, rightly or wrongly, been elevated to the peerage. Jefferson recognized, of course, the biologically inequality of all men: “There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds for this are virtue* and talents…There is also an artificial aristocracy,
founded on wealth and birth, without either virtue or talents; for with these, it would belong in the first class.” (*In Jefferson’s time “virtue” still retained its proper meaning, denoting manly excellence, including courage and integrity as shown by both moral and intellectual honesty. [footnote in original])(Revilo P. Oliver, Who’s for Democracy? http://www.stormfront.org/rpo/DEMOCRAC.htm)

The watchword of the French Revolution was Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. A little thought confirms that these three objectives are incompatible. Free men are not equal and equal men are not free. Equality must be imposed as we see in the current Canadian context. In the original ruling of the CHRT and reinforced by the Federal Court, it was stated that my writings do not constitute ‘legitimate political discourse’ because they do not ‘promote equality’. By their own admission they have stated that only political opinions which promote ‘equality’ are to be viewed as legitimate. Without the ongoing enforcement of equality society could resolve itself into a natural hierarchy with a natural aristocracy based on moral integrity and natural talents as referred to in the above quoted paragraph. It is my view that successful societies approximate the ideal of merit based hierarchies but I am not allowed to express that view according to the enforcers of ‘equality’. The constant leveling required to enforce equality leads to intense political repression which was the ultimate fate of the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. The constant leveling requires the ongoing overthrow of the superior by means of the inferior. The enforcement of equality destroys both liberty and fraternity. That is Canada’s fate under the current regime.

Summary

To summarize, I request that the court dismiss the charge of contempt. My purpose in ignoring the cease and desist order was to address the urgent matter of impending White extinction and to argue against the new one-world religion of Equality. It is my profound concern that Canada will continue its slide into a nightmare of Political Correctness where only hypocrites and liars will have a voice. Therefore, I request that the court recognize my writings as fair social commentary.

Israeli Orthodox schools refuse Ethiopian students

August 15, 2009 Leave a comment

As usual, one set of rules for Jews, another set for everyone else.

Petah Tikva Orthodox schools refuse Ethiopian students

Ethiopian Jews are oppressed in Israel

At least 100 students of Ethiopian origin in Petah Tikva do not know what school they will be attending in the fall, with the opening of the school year just two and a half weeks away. The uncertainty stems from the fact that the city’s private schools with an ultra-Orthodox or national Orthodox bent have refused to accept children of Ethiopian origin.

Much of the funding for the private schools comes from the Education Ministry and the city. Education Ministry director general Shimshon Shoshani said Wednesday that the schools that continue to refuse to enroll the children will be fined and may have their licenses suspended.

A few days ago the Petah Tikva municipality told the city’s private schools that they would need to enroll about 70 students of Ethiopian origin. Another 30 students were to be enrolled in the public Orthodox school system, where most Ethiopian-Israeli students go. However, sources at the ministry and municipality said conversations with officials at the private schools indicated that they would refuse to enroll the children.

Administrators at the city’s public Orthodox schools said they would not accept the 30 children as planned.

Sources familiar with the situation said that around 150 to 200 students of Ethiopian origin are to go to school in Petah Tikva.

According to a senior city official, the private schools “told us specifically that they do not intend to register the new students. It’s clear to everyone that the response to the enrollment instruction would be negative, but we had to go public with it to allow the Education Ministry to begin the process of imposing monetary fines.”

The Education Ministry was unable to provide figures on the percentage of Ethiopian-Israeli children in Petah Tikva in the coming school year and suggested that the municipality would have the figures.

Ethiopian Jews in Israel protest against racist policies.

Numbers obtained from various sources vary widely. Sources in the official (public Orthodox) system say their schools have an enrollment of between 10 percent and 100 percent of children of Ethiopian origin. The entire student body at the public Orthodox Ner Etzion school is Ethiopian-Israeli after the other children’s parents enrolled them elsewhere over the past two years.

Even among the private schools, enrollment of Ethiopian-Israelis varies. Private schools with a less strict ultra-Orthodox bent take in more Ethiopian-Israelis (7 to 8 percent), while private schools of the Zionist ultra-Orthodox stream enroll as little as 2 percent.

“We demand an egalitarian and balanced division of immigrant absorption in the city,” said the chairman of the citywide parents committee for Petah Tikva’s public Orthodox schools, Nir Orbach. Orbach indicated that the private schools make themselves attractive to parents “for example by having no immigrant integration at all, while we fight every day to survive.” Orbach said that if the private schools did not take the children, “we will shut down the school system in the city.”

Hakol Hinuch, an association working for educational reform nationwide, warned that it would take the case to the High Court of Justice to force the private schools to increase their number of Ethiopian-Israeli children. In a letter to Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar, Hakol Hinuch’s legal adviser Aviad Cohen wrote that the case was one of “improper discrimination from a moral point of view, in opposition to fundamental principles, both Jewish and democratic.”

According to Hakol Hinuch’s executive director, Rabbi Shay Piron, only a few weeks ago the private schools had demanded 100 percent of the funding they are entitled to according to the so-called Gafni law, and that “now it turns out that they are willing to take part in zero percent of public obligations, like helping to absorb immigrants.”

In response, Yigal Amitay, representing the private Darchei Noam school belonging to the Zionist ultra-Orthdox system, with a student body of 600, said the school had accepted 14 Ethiopian-Israeli students. “As for the coming year, we will accept anyone who suits the Torah-focused atmosphere and the intensive level of studies at the school. All students the city refers to us will be examined,” Amitay said.

Haim Freulichman, the chairman of the association supporting another of Petah Tikva’s private ultra-Orthodox schools, Da’at Mevinim, said that “we have accepted and we will continue to accept students of Ethiopian origin. Everything is coordinated with the municipality.”

The figures show that Da’at Mevinim enrolled only about seven children of Ethiopian origin.

The other private schools declined to comment for this report.

The director of an organization of representatives of Ethiopian-Israeli community groups, Dani Kashun, said that “the struggle is focusing on the fact that the schools have to enroll our children. A refusal to do so is discrimination. This is not a community problem only, but one with broad implications – today it’s immigrants from Ethiopia, tomorrow it can happen to any other community.”

The Education Ministry said Wednesday: “It is the obligation of the local authority to assure the enrollment of all students living in its jurisdiction. The ministry will demand that the students also be enrolled in the ‘recognized but unofficial schools.’ If this is not done, the ministry will take all the educational and administrative steps at its disposal.”

Documentary sparks uproar at Jewish film fest

July 25, 2009 Leave a comment

Rachel Corrie film sparks shrieking and spitting at Jewish film fest

Of particular interest in this article is how the Jews as a people are moving rapidly to make criticism of Israel fall into the category of “anti-Semitism.”

“At the core of the debate are questions about how broadly Jews can discuss Israel within their own community – and how Jews represent Israel to the broader world. It is also overlaid with accusations of the “new anti-Semitism,” prejudice that is disguised as particular criticisms of Israel, the only Jewish state.”

See also: Are modern Jews really Semitic?

It should be quite obvious to the average person that Jews don’t take criticism very well, especially when the criticism points to crimes that the Jews as a people have committed against others.

The Jews are making the Western world more and more like the USSR everyday, except with more negroes, Arabs, gypsies, hispanics and homosexuals. The question looming is will they ultimately succeed? or will the West awaken from its slumber and send the Jews back to wander the desert for another 40 years?

Categories: Israel, zionism